Why the current India side is the best Test team of its time

They have won close to two-thirds of their Tests in the most recent cycle, and their fast bowlers and spinners alike have delivered stellar numbers

Kartikeya Date12-Jul-2023India have now lost four knockout matches in ICC tournaments in England in Tests and ODIs, all at two-year intervals, in 2017, 2019, 2021 and 2023. In among these four setbacks, their T20 international side failed to win any World Cups too. It has been a humiliating period for India’s millions of fans, and like most humiliated fans, they’re asking questions.It is now just past ten years that India last won an ICC tournament, when they beat South Africa, West Indies, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and then England in a rain-affected final in the 2013 ICC Champions Trophy. In this period, they have won the ODI and T20I Asia Cups once each, and the Nidahas Trophy in 2018, but no ICC title. Across three formats, in ten years, India have lost eight ICC knockout matches – three ODIs, three T20Is and two Tests. In these ten years, India have played 207 other ODIs, 151 other T20Is, and 96 other Tests, and won them all at a ratio of close to two wins to each loss – a rate that no previous Indian side has approached. By any reasonable measure, this is not only the best Indian side yet, it is one of the greatest cricket teams in the history of the game.Related

Succession: What next for India in Tests?

How did India build their world-beating bench strength? They have a system

Could India become mighty like West Indies and Australia of old?

India are the best Test team irrespective of WTC standings

This article looks at only Test cricket, since that’s where India have apparently most recently failed. However, it is difficult to compare Test teams because unlike, say, a formal league (such as the IPL, or the English Premier League in football), Test cricket does not operate on a regular calendar. The Future Tours Programme provides for home and away tours over a four- or five-year cycle. Leaving Afghanistan and Ireland aside for now, since they are just beginning their time as Test teams, the other ten Test teams are supposed to play each other home and away regularly. One way to evaluate teams, which is used in this article, is to consider each team’s most recent home and away series against the other nine teams.Note: For many seasons in the 21st century, Pakistan fulfilled their “home” fixtures in the Test tours calendar in the UAE (several teams, several seasons), in Sri Lanka (2002-03 vs Australia), and in England (2010 vs Aus). These fixtures are counted as home fixtures for Pakistan in this article.This method is not perfect. No method is. But considering that the key virtue of Test cricket is that it tests its contestants under a wide variety of circumstances, looking at the most recent home and away results is among the better ways of evaluating Test teams. There are some obvious problems here, such as India not having played Pakistan in Tests since 2007-08, and India having played Australia twice in Australia in the last five years. In all such cases, the most recent series result is included. Eighteen series are considered for each team – nine at home and nine away.

As things currently stand (see the table above), India have won 32 and lost ten Tests in their most recent home and away series, and won 14 series, lost three and shared one. Along with Australia, they are the best team of this era. Let’s consider the picture at two recent points in Test history when the Indian Test team reached a peak of sorts – at the end of the 2003-04 season, when they split a series in Australia and won in Pakistan (second table), and at the end of the 2010-11 season, when they split a series in South Africa (third table).The striking thing about the 2003-04 chart below is the near parity of the five mid-table teams – England, India, New Zealand, Sri Lanka and Pakistan – far behind South Africa, the second-best team of that cycle, and Australia. It suggests that these teams found it difficult to compete against Australia (South Africa were temporarily in decline by the middle of 2004 – Allan Donald had retired, and Dale Steyn was yet to develop into the maestro he eventually became). These mid-table sides were all able to win about a third of their Tests. Australia, with Shane Warne and Glenn McGrath in their ranks during this period, had a bowling attack that no other side could match. Eventually, England would match them at home in 2005, and win back the Ashes for the first time since 1986-87.

The landscape had shifted by 2010-11 in two respects. First, England, South Africa, India and Sri Lanka had improved. Second, it was an era of relatively shallow attacks and excellent batting wickets. At the end of the 2022-23 season, 173 out of 209 Tests (83%) produced outright results. By the end of the 2010-11 season, 162 out of 221 Tests (73%) had produced outright results. India had the second-best record of all teams by the end of the 2010-11 season, but they won less than half their Tests.

Evidence for the relative shallowness of bowling attacks and batting friendliness of the conditions during the first decade of this century is also seen in the bowling averages by bowling position. Rolling bowling averages by bowling position are shown in the graph below. The bowling position for a bowler in an innings is when the bowler is first asked to bowl in the innings. New-ball bowlers occupy positions one (the bowler who delivers the first over of the innings) and two (the bowler who delivers the second over of the innings). The first-change bowler occupies position three, the second change position four, and so on.Getty ImagesFor much of the 20th century (with a brief exception in the 1960s) at least one, if not both new- ball bowlers in Tests took their wickets at a cost of under 30 runs per wicket on average. Change bowlers have taken their wickets between 30 and 35 runs per wicket, with the exception of the 1950s, when the third and fourth bowlers averaged 29-30 runs per wicket. In the early 2000s change bowlers only managed 34-37 runs per wicket. From 2000 to 2011, Australia played 136 Tests, of which only 21 (15%) were drawn. Of the 411 Tests not involving Australia during this period, 116 (28%) were drawn.In the second decade of this century, and especially in the second half of this decade, with the effects of the DRS, fewer featherbeds, and deeper pace attacks, outright results have become more common. Of the most recent 200 Tests, 28 were drawn. In the 200-Test span ending in the last Test of the 2010-11 season, which ran from March 2006 to January 2011 (no Tests were played from February 2011 to May that year, because of the ODI World Cup), 57 were drawn. The effect of shallower attacks is seen even in matches involving outright results, and not just in the frequency of outright results. In periods with weaker new-ball bowling, the average cost of a wicket for both winning and losing sides rises (see the table below).

The current era has been one of great bowling depth in more Test teams, especially in their home conditions, than ever before. In eras with deeper bowling attacks, more teams can realistically win Test matches. Conditions that make draws unlikely (absent inclement weather for significant periods of the Test) make defeat more likely for both sides. Taking 20 wickets is necessary for winning a Test match (the rare exceptions being declarations that have gone wrong, or the even rarer innings forfeit). In the table above, 198 teams (or 49.5%) managed to bowl the opposition out twice in a Test in the 200 Tests from Test No. 2201 to No. 2400, and 99 (55%) have managed it in Tests since January 2021. Among the many reasons for this improvement is the advent of the DRS, and improved drainage and ground-management technology, which has shortened weather interruptions. In what is arguably one of the less discussed aspects of the contemporary game, ubiquitous access of video analysis, ball-tracking records, and most crucially, superior fitness and workload management for bowlers, have also helped. Since January 2016, four out of ten Test teams have bowled the opposition out twice in at least half their Tests.India have won 64% of the Tests in their most recent cycle, during which time the factors described in the paragraph above have been in play. It is an extraordinary achievement by an extraordinary side. Few teams in the history of Test cricket have competed as well as India have with their fast and slow bowlers alike. In the 34 Tests India have played outside Asia after Test No. 2200 (in 2016), their fast bowlers have taken 372 wickets at 26.8 apiece, while their spinners have managed 174 wickets at 28.6 apiece. In 41 Tests in Asia during the same period, India’s spinners have managed 523 wickets at 22.6 runs per wicket, and their fast bowlers have managed 238 wickets at 24.6 runs per wicket. No other team has achieved this sub-30 record across the board (pace and spin) in conditions that might be considered seam-dominant and conditions that might be considered spin-dominant. England, Australia and South Africa have had more potent pace attacks than India outside Asia during this period, but their spinners have been significantly more expensive (with the exception of Australia, who have Nathan Lyon in their ranks). Similarly, New Zealand and West Indies have had pace attacks comparable to India in Tests outside Asia during this period, but their spinners have also been more expensive. Everywhere India travels, they face excellent attacks.Consider the example of India beating England in England. Technically, they failed to achieve this in 2021, since the fifth Test of that series was postponed, and they lost that postponed match, at Edgbaston in 2022, and the series was squared 2-2. Before then, India beat England in England in 1971, 1986 and 2007. All three were short series. In 1971 and 2007, rain saved them from near certain defeat at least once (arguably twice in 1971). In 1986, England lost at home to both India and New Zealand after being whitewashed by West Indies in the West Indies.Of the three Indian series wins in England, they were luckiest in 1971, against Ray Illingworth’s side, which had just won the Ashes in Australia. In 1986, John Lever (67 wickets), Graham Dilley (50), Richard Ellison (34), Neil Foster (34) and Derek Pringle (16) were England’s most experienced seamers, and Phil Edmonds (91) and John Emburey (89) the most experienced spinners. In 2007, James Anderson (46) and Ryan Sidebottom (16) were England’s most experienced seamers. Chris Tremlett was on debut. Monty Panesar (65) was England’s most experienced spinner. The 2021 and 2022 Tests were different. The English attack included Anderson (617) and Stuart Broad (523), to go with Moeen Ali (181), Ben Stokes (158) and Chris Woakes (112). In addition, they had Ollie Robinson, who has since shown himself to be a world-class Test match fast bowler. The 2021-22 England side were a different proposition compared to the 1971, 1986 and 2007 ones.This great Indian era, however, is coming to an end now. The Indian Test team of 2023 is their oldest ever in Test cricket in terms of average age. The team that faced Australia in the WTC final in June 2023 had an average age of 32.6 years. The sides of 2010-11 (30.6 years), 2003-04 (27.1 years) and 2013-14 (27.6 years) are the other India teams considered in this article. It is an inescapable downside of having a generation of a dozen or so players of similar age who all turned out to be world-class competitors.

Change is in the air. The Indian selectors have signalled as much by leaving out Umesh Yadav (age 35) and Cheteshwar Pujara (35), and resting Mohammed Shami (32), and replacing them with Mukesh Kumar (29), Ruturaj Gaikwad (26) and Yashasvi Jaiswal (21). Four regulars – Shreyas Iyer, KL Rahul, Jasprit Bumrah and Rishabh Pant – remain sidelined with injuries. Ishant Sharma (34) already seems to be out of Test contention for fitness reasons.This is yet another problem of a successful era in which the core of a team is more or less of the same age. If India now look for batting replacements in the 20-24 age group, which is where they have historically found their best batters, it will mean bypassing a couple of cricketing generations of batters (if we take a cricketing generation to be about six years – the time involved in a player moving from Under-15 cricket to the senior level at age 21). Of the 46 players who have batted in the top six for India A in first-class matches since the start of 2016, eight have played for India (discounting the likes of Ajinkya Rahane, Cheteshwar Pujara, KL Rahul and Wriddhiman Saha, who had already made their Test debuts by 2016). Of these, only Shubman Gill, Rishabh Pant, and perhaps Shreyas Iyer, currently command a first-choice spot in the India Test XI. Several of their India A colleagues, like Abhimanyu Easwaran (27), Priyank Panchal (33), Hanuma Vihari (29), Ankit Bawne (30), Ravikumar Samarth (30) and Karun Nair (31), seem to have been leapfrogged now by Jaiswal and Gaikwad (who are also India A alums). Srikar Bharat has been the regular India A wicketkeeper, but despite being a magnificent keeper, he is unlikely to keep his Test spot when the brilliant Pant (India A, 2017-18) returns from his injury. There isn’t an obvious solution to this problem.

What does the future look like? For a glimpse, consider the state of Test cricket at the end of the 2013-14 season (see table above). Having won 12 and lost two series (difference: ten) in their cycle ending with the 2010-11 season, India finished the 2013-14 season having lost six series and won nine – a reversal of seven series (out of 18). Until a new generation, or at least, a new core settles into its place, India will find winning Test matches and series significantly more difficult than they have made it seem in the last few years. India have won 172 and lost 176 in their 570-Test history. Fifty of those 172 Test wins (and only 21 defeats) have come since Virat Kohli took over the Test team from MS Dhoni in December 2014. Of their 286 Tests outside India, 58 have been won and 122 lost. Since Kohli took over from Dhoni, there have been 20 wins and 19 defeats in Tests outside India.We could remember two Test matches in England in June, or we could remember 50 Test wins everywhere in the world in every month of the calendar. The choice is ours. When teams win a lot, winning often appears easy. It is never easy. I know how I will remember this Indian team – as the best team in the world of its time, and as one of the greatest teams in the history of Test cricket.

October 13 at the T20 World Cup: Injury concerns for Australia ahead of blockbuster game vs India

England, meanwhile, will be looking to maintain their winning start to the tournament when they take on Scotland

Sruthi Ravindranath12-Oct-2024England vs ScotlandSharjah, 2pm local timeEngland squad: Heather Knight (capt), Lauren Bell, Maia Bouchier, Alice Capsey, Charlie Dean, Sophia Dunkley, Sophie Ecclestone, Danielle Gibson, Sarah Glenn, Bess Heath, Amy Jones (wk), Freya Kemp, Nat Sciver-Brunt, Linsey Smith, Danni WyattScotland squad: Kathryn Bryce (capt), Chloe Abel, Abbi Aitken-Drummond, Olivia Bell, Sarah Bryce (wk), Darcey Carter, Priyanaz Chatterji, Katherine Fraser, Saskia Horley, Lorna Jack, Ailsa Lister, Abtaha Maqsood, Megan McColl, Hannah Rainey, Rachel SlaterTournament form guide: England have won both matches they’ve played so far – against Bangladesh and South Africa – while Scotland are coming into the match having lost all three of their games.News brief: These teams will be facing each other for the first time in T20Is. England are coming into this match after a gap of five days, having last played against South Africa on Monday.Scotland are out of the semi-final race. The Group B table has three teams – England, West Indies and South Africa – still in contention for the semi-final, with England having the lowest net run rate among them. England will be looking to improve their NRR with a big win.”There was a little bit of illness at one point but I think hopefully everyone will be available,” England captain Heather Knight said of player availability ahead of the match.This will also be Scotland wicketkeeper-batter Lorna Jack-Brown’s last international match.Player to watch: Danni Wyatt-Hodge has been solid at top of the order for England. Chasing a tricky target of 125 on a slow Sharjah pitch, with left-arm spinners bowling from both ends, she dropped anchor after the early loss of Maia Bouchier and stitched a 64-run stand with Nat Sciver-Brunt. She finished with 43 in as many balls, which followed her Player-of-the-Match performance of 41 against Bangladesh.Harmanpreet Kaur’s 52 took India to a win against Sri Lanka•ICC via Getty ImagesAustralia vs IndiaSharjah, 6pm local timeAustralia squad: Alyssa Healy (capt & wk), Darcie Brown, Ashleigh Gardner, Kim Garth, Grace Harris, Alana King, Phoebe Litchfield, Tahlia McGrath, Sophie Molineux, Beth Mooney, Ellyse Perry, Megan Schutt, Annabel Sutherland, Tayla Vlaeminck, Georgia WarehamIndia squad: Harmanpreet Kaur (capt), Smriti Mandhana (vice-capt), Yastika Bhatia (wk), Shafali Verma, Deepti Sharma, Jemimah Rodrigues, Richa Ghosh (wk), Pooja Vastrakar, Arundhati Reddy, Renuka Singh, D Hemalatha, Asha Sobhana, Radha Yadav, Shreyanka Patil, S SajanaTournament form guide: Australia have three wins in three matches and are coming into this contest having comprehensively beaten Pakistan. With that win, they also all but sealed a semi-final spot thanks to their net run rate of 2.786. India have two wins in three games. In their previous match, they posted the highest total of the tournament so far – 172 for 3 – and in return bundled Sri Lanka out for 90 to post their biggest win by runs at the T20 World Cup.Related

India flex their muscle in prelude to high-voltage Australia clash

What do New Zealand need to qualify for the semi-finals?

Lorna Jack-Brown, Scotland cricketer and crime fighter

Alyssa Healy feels pain as Australia face World Cup depth test

Vlaeminck dislocates shoulder on T20 World Cup return

News brief: Australia have major injury concerns heading into the crucial clash. Just four balls into the match against Pakistan, Tayla Vlaeminck was out with a right shoulder dislocation. To make things worse, captain Alyssa Healy suffered “an acute right foot injury” while batting on 37 as she hobbled off the field with Australia needing 14 runs to win. Both players went for scans on Saturday.India captain Harmanpreet Kaur, who had hurt her neck in the match against Pakistan, turned up with a pain-relief patch on the right side of her neck during the Sri Lanka match. She also didn’t take the field during the chase. Fast bowler Pooja Vastrakar bowled full-tilt before the Sri Lanka game but didn’t play.India will want a big win against Australia. If they win by more than 61 runs, they will move ahead of Australia, thereby automatically qualifying for the semi-final. In a case where India win by fewer than 60 runs, they will hope New Zealand win by a very small margin against Pakistan on Monday. For instance, if India make 150 against Australia and win by exactly 10 runs, New Zealand need to beat Pakistan by 28 runs defending 150 to go ahead of India’s NRR. If India lose to Australia by more than 17 runs while chasing a target of 151, then New Zealand’s NRR will be ahead of India, even if Pakistan beat New Zealand by just 1 run while defending 150.Overall, India have won just eight out of 34 T20Is they’ve played against Australia. Two of those wins came in the group-stage games of previous T20 World Cups, in 2018 and 2020.Players to watch: Two of their best batters finding their form bodes well for India heading into the big game. Harmanpreet and Mandhana’s collaborative effort against Pakistan boosted India’s NRR with the semi-final race heating up. Mandhana, after a cautious start to her innings, changed gears and took on Sri Lanka’s spinners to make 50 off 38 balls. Harmanpreet, continuing from where she’d left against Pakistan, played a classic, hitting eight fours and a six on her way to a 27-ball 52. It was just what India needed to reinvigorate their T20 World Cup campaign.

Man City confirm new signing will take iconic No. 10 shirt following Jack Grealish's departure for Everton

Manchester City have wasted no time in filling the famous No.10 shirt, handing it to French prodigy Rayan Cherki in the wake of Jack Grealish’s departure to Everton. The 21-year-old arrived from Lyon just before the FIFA Club World Cup in a deal worth €36 million (£30.5m), with further add-ons potentially inflating the fee.

Cherki takes City’s iconic No.10 shirtGrealish heads to Everton on loanGuardiola eyes fresh start for new season at MolineuxFollow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱WHAT HAPPENED?

Cherki’s move is being billed as a long-term masterstroke, with City seeing him as a creative spark to help bridge the gap left by the exits of club icon Kevin De Bruyne and now Grealish. Known for his silky close control and ability to glide past defenders, the youngster has been on City’s radar since emerging as a standout talent in Ligue 1.

AdvertisementGeTHE BIGGER PICTURE

Last season, Cherki notched the joint-highest number of assists (11) in the French top flight and was one of only two non-Paris Saint-Germain players to earn a place in the Ligue 1 Team of the Season. Soon, after his unveiling, he hinted at his preferred playing position, which aligns with his jersey number, "I prefer to play No.10, but right now I just want to play. Where I am on the pitch is not important; I just want to be on the pitch and help the team to win. I am ready.” 

DID YOU KNOW?

While Cherki’s arrival marks a new chapter, Grealish’s loan move to Everton marks the end of a turbulent period at City. The England international, signed for a British-record fee in 2021, has struggled for consistency under Guardiola and saw his minutes dwindle last season. 

Now heading to Merseyside on a season-long loan, Grealish will work under David Moyes in what could be a career-defining stint. Everton have secured an option to make the deal permanent next summer for around £50 million ($67m), a figure that could tempt City to cut ties for good if the 29-year-old flourishes. 

AFPWHAT NEXT FOR MANCHESTER CITY?

Pep Guardiola’s men will begin their Premier League campaign on Saturday with a trip to Molineux to face Wolves. After an underwhelming season, as per City's high standards, they will look to dethrone Liverpool from the perch and reclaim domestic dominance. 

Mignon du Preez may have quit internationals but she's still in cricket full-time

The former South Africa batter and captain looks back at her career, ahead to the World Cup in her country, and league life after

Firdose Moonda08-Feb-2023Mignon du Preez broke cricket’s glass ceiling in heels. Sort of.”When people hear the word ‘cricketer’, they think you need to be a little bit more butch. They don’t think you can be a cricketer and be girly. They think if you’ve got your nails done, surely you can’t catch a ball. I tried to show that you can still be a girly girl and be competitive,” she says. “There was a definitely a time when people would think cricket and that it’s only for boys.”Du Preez was one of the “Iconic Women” who took part in the ICC Women’s T20 World Cup Trophy Tour recently. Now retired and hoping to start a family, she played international cricket for over 15 years in a career that spanned South African women’s cricket’s transition from amateur to professional. And she did it all with long blonde hair.Related

Mignon du Preez: 'I've got this new hunger to get back on the field again'

Mignon du Preez has got her mojo working, and it's come at the perfect time

Mignon du Preez retires from all international cricket

“We had to change people’s perception,” she says. “There was lack of visibility. Nobody knew about us. Our games were not televised and girls’ cricket was not a mainstream sport in schools. The hardest thing was to get girls to take up the sport.”Her own primary school did not have a girls’ team, so, like so many from the pioneering generation of women’s cricketers, she played with boys. “There was one parent that had a complaint because there was a girl [du Preez] in the team and their son was not playing and I remember the coaches said, ‘But she’s better than him,'” she says.There was no arguing with that. Du Preez was only 12 years old when she struck 258 in a 40-over match and “kind of realised that cricket could be a career choice”.Five years later she made her international debut. “It was during the holiday time and one of the players got injured and I got a call-up,” she says.Du Preez holds up the World Cup trophy during a promotional event for this year’s tournament in South Africa late last year•Liezl Zwarts/ICC T20 Women’s World Cup Trophy Tour by NissanIt was only seven years into her career that South Africa’s matches were first televised. In September 2014, SuperSport screened the three-match T20I series between South Africa and England. Earlier that year the team du Preez led reached the semi-final of the T20 World Cup. The broadcast interest in them was reward for a decent campaign but they were unable to repay the faith immediately. South Africa were completely outplayed in the first two matches in England and also lost the third, though they put up more of a fight in that game.At the time du Preez was halfway through her captaincy, a role she was thrust into almost by accident at 22, when the regular captain was injured. “I was a very young captain, so tactically I felt like I kind of was thrown into the deep end and I didn’t really know much,” she says. “On the first couple of tours, I almost needed to have script notes for who is going to bowl when and where.”But what I thought I was really good at was people-management skills. I had an open-door policy and definitely wanted to get the best out of the players. We weren’t professional and so we were just trying to change perceptions.”That same year du Preez played her first, and only, Test, where she scored the century she describes as one of her career highlights, although not for the reasons you may think.”It was really special but also quite a challenging experience. What I remember most was how I got out in the second innings,” she says. “Because I did so well in the first innings, I just kind of hoped I would pick up where I left off. Poonam Yadav was bowling to me and I had this plan that if she tossed it up, I was going to use my feet and hit her. But then also, she’s a legspinner, so a sweep was a good option if she tosses it down leg. She ended up tossing it up and down leg, I double-stepped and missed it completely and got stumped. It was not your typical Test-match shot. Today you can get away with it, with a lot of innovative cricket being played, but then it was not the typical dismissal you would see in a Test.”Most South Africans would not even have been aware that the match took place. The women’s team didn’t become a big part of the national cricket conversation until 2017, when du Preez stepped down from the leadership but played in her 100th ODI and South Africa made the semi-final of the 50-over World Cup. “That’s when people started taking notice and our players started becoming role models. That was where the big change happened,” she said.Du Preez during a partnership with Celeste Raack of Ireland in the Fairbreak tournament in 2022. “What made that tournament special was the camaraderie,” she says. “It was where sport just united everybody”•FairBreak GlobalNow in 2023, South Africa find themselves in focus in women’s sport. Last month they hosted the inaugural Under-19 women’s T20 World Cup, and this month they host the senior event. In July-August, they will stage the netball World Cup, and the national women’s football team will compete in the World Cup for the second successive time – an incredible feat against the backdrop of the men not qualifying for the same event in 20 years (they qualified automatically as hosts in 2010).Du Preez is no longer involved in a playing capacity for South Africa but remains a keen observer from the sidelines, and is still a sportsperson through and through. On the day of this interview she was also in the nets.”It’s almost like riding a bike but sometimes it’s not like that,” she says. “The last time I didn’t play for a while, I struggled to get the timing because I was just so eager to get bat on ball and I’d be too early on every shot. But today I think it was a lot more relaxed. I think that comes with age. Practice is there to make mistakes and it ended up being fewer mistakes than I thought.”Like so many female cricketers, du Preez has put her name in the hat for the WPL auction, where she hopes to get what could be a life-changing deal. Although she recognises that the growth of leagues could be a threat to the international game, having spent so much of her career in the amateur era, no one will begrudge her cashing in. “These leagues pay their players really well but ultimately you want your best players to be available for national selection, and to do that you also need to ensure that you pay them well enough so that they want to play for their country,” she says.Essentially that’s part of the story for her own reasons for retiring. After she opted to step away from ODI cricket in April last year, du Preez was unable to keep her central contract because CSA do not offer single-format-only deals. With bills to pay, du Preez decided to call it quits completely and seek opportunities in franchise leagues.She won’t be lured into a national comeback for the World Cup but will be involved in the tournament in a commentary role. She will be rooting for South Africa, though.”If I think with my heart, I’m going to say they are going to win,” she says. “But if I think with my head, realistically, Australia have dominated women’s cricket in the last couple of years and they are just so far ahead. They’ve got a lot of talent to pick from. In South Africa we don’t have such a big pool. But I am excited to see a few other teams. England – they’ve also invested quite a bit – and then India, they’ve been really good recently and it will be really good if they do well because if India does well, women’s cricket does well.”Du Preez top-scored with 76 not out in the semi-final of the 2017 50-over World Cup but it wasn’t enough to get South Africa across the line•Getty ImagesClosing the gap between those top-tier teams and the rest is a subject that interests du Preez. She was involved in the inaugural Fairbreak T20 tournament in the UAE last year and has since become a marketing consultant for the organisation. She sees competitions like that one as a way to level the playing field.”Fairbreak gives opportunities to players that come from Associate nations to earn a living from cricket. They get their first professional contract and they get to play alongside their heroes. We had all the big names, from Stafanie Taylor and Sophie Devine to Marizanne Kapp and Ayabonga Khaka,” she says.And though events like Fairbreak are competitive, it’s less about which team wins or loses and more about individuals gaining from it. “What made that tournament even more special was the camaraderie. When you go to a World Cup or the WBBL or the Hundred, it’s really feisty and the competition is fierce. This tournament was where sport just united everybody. It was so good just to see the interaction between the players and how the players from the Full-Member nations shared their knowledge with the Associate players and how everybody was rooting for them to do well. I remember everyone cheering for Wini [Malaysia captain Winifred Duraisingam]. It’s growing and it’s going to offer more opportunities.”One of the players at the tournament was then 18-year-old Henriette Ishimwe from Rwanda, who went on to take four wickets in four balls at the U-19 World Cup, leading Rwanda to a historic first win at a major tournament. Well before Ishimwe achieved that feat, she had fans from her time at Fairbreak. “My husband actually asked me to speak to Henriette because he wanted her shirt,” du Preez says.And in doing that du Preez and her husband, Tony, shattered another glass ceiling. It’s only recently that female sportspeople, especially in team sports, have become role models and du Preez believes that as perceptions continue to change, that will only increase. “I was part of the commentary team for the U-19 Women’s T20 World Cup and I was looking through the player bios and so many of the girls had women role models, and I was like, wow, we’ve done something right. Finally.”

Weather and pitch in focus as India, Bangladesh ponder three spinners

India lead the series 1-0 after winning the first Test in Chennai by 280 runs

Hemant Brar26-Sep-20242:23

Manjrekar: I will play Kuldeep Yadav in the second Test

Big picture: Another stern test awaits BangladeshBangladesh came into this series riding on the high of winning 2-0 in Pakistan. It peaked when they had India 144 for 6 in the first innings in Chennai. But then India once again showed why they are arguably the strongest home side in Test history and went on to steamroll Bangladesh by 280 runs.It was a show of India’s depth in both batting and bowling. Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli managed only 34 runs between them across four innings, but India had three centurions and two half-centurions. When it came to bowling, their seamers shared eight wickets in Bangladesh’s first innings and the spinners nine during the second.Things will not get easier for Bangladesh in Kanpur, where New Zealand’s tail had held on to secure a draw the last time a Test was played here. There is also some uncertainty about the pitch. The ground staff were preparing two surfaces and, as of noon on the eve of the match, it was not clear which one would be used.Related

Green Park's C stand deemed 'unsafe' for India-Bangladesh Test

Shakib 'eligible for selection' for Kanpur Test against India

Ravindra Jadeja, the quick and the deadly

Kanpur generally offers good Test-match pitches that help fast bowlers on the first morning before flattening out and assisting spinners on the last two days. However, the weather could be an issue this time, with rain forecast on the first three days. That could impact not just the pitch but also the toss decision and team compositions.But all is not bleak for Bangladesh. In their second innings in Chennai, their openers gave them a solid start, followed by Najmul Hossain Shanto’s return to form with 82. In their first innings, Shakib Al Hasan, Litton Das and Mehidy Hasan Miraz all got starts. But to be competitive against this Indian team at home, you have to be at your best for much longer periods. Can Bangladesh do that?Form guideIndia WWWWW (last five Tests, most recent first)
Bangladesh LWWLL0:48

Manjrekar: Bangladesh attack lacks quality and experience

In the spotlight: Shubman Gill and Shakib Al HasanShubman Gill knows his ceiling. Even after scoring 452 runs with two hundreds in the home series against England earlier this year, he recently said he was yet to fulfil his expectations as a Test player. Gill got out for a duck in the first innings of the Chennai Test against Bangladesh but scored a stroke-filled unbeaten 119 in the second. Given India are to face tougher opponents in the coming months – New Zealand and Australia – Gill would be keen to fine-tune his game at No. 3.When is Shakib Al Hasan not in the spotlight? While batting in Chennai, he was seen biting a black strap, wrapped around his neck, to keep his head from falling over. When it was time to bowl, there were murmurs about his workload, ineffectiveness and discomfort with the spinning finger. And after Bangladesh head coach Chandika Hathurusinghe confirmed Shakib’s availability for the second Test, he dropped a bombshell about his future on the eve of the match.Team news: Wait and watch?There was no indication from the Indian camp whether they would play three spinners. Even if they do, it may not be a straightforward choice. If the pitch is too slow, Axar Patel could be handy with his pace and attacking the stumps. But India already have a similar spinner in Ravindra Jadeja. In Kuldeep Yadav’s favour, this is his home ground. So he is a tempting option, too. If India play one of Axar or Kuldeep, Akash Deep could be the one to miss out.India (probable): 1 Rohit Sharma (capt), 2 Yashasvi Jaiswal, 3 Shubman Gill, 4 Virat Kohli, 5 Rishabh Pant (wk), 6 KL Rahul, 7 Ravindra Jadeja, 8 R Ashwin, 9 Kuldeep Yadav/Axar Patel, 10 Jasprit Bumrah, 11 Mohammed SirajIf Bangladesh go with three spinners, Taijul Islam could replace Nahid Rana. That could also help with Shakib’s workload, if required.Bangladesh (probable): 1 Shadman Islam, 2 Zakir Hasan, 3 Najmul Hossain Shanto (capt), 4 Mominul Haque, 5 Mushfiqur Rahim, 6 Shakib Al Hasan, 7 Litton Das (wk), 8 Mehidy Hasan Miraz, 9 Taijul Islam, 10 Hasan Mahmud, 11 Taskin AhmedGautam Gambhir and Abhishek Nayar inspect one of two pitches in consideration for the Kanpur Test•AFP/Getty ImagesPitch and conditions: Slow and low bounce?The red-soil pitch in Chennai had decent bounce for both seamers and spinners in the first Test. Kanpur will be different. The two pitches being considered for the match are black-soil surfaces. They are likely to be flatter, with lower bounce, and are expected to become slower as the Test progresses. All that could change if it rains as forecasted, and bad light could become a factor too towards the end of each day.Stats and trivia: Jadeja double on the cards For the first time in their Test history, India have more wins (179) than losses (178). Jadeja is one short of becoming the seventh Indian to take 300 Test wickets. When Jadeja gets there, he will also complete the double of 3000 runs and 300 wickets. If he does it in Kanpur, in his 74th Test, he will be the second fastest to do so after Ian Botham (72). Virat Kohli is 129 short of 9000 Test runs. Taijul is five short of 200 Test wickets. Only Shakib (242) has more Test wickets for Bangladesh. Quotes”We don’t particularly pattern bad pitches. But we try to make sure the conditions are tough enough so that the players are challenged. A lot of these guys have played for so many years. Only if they’re challenged are they going to get better. So sometimes the thought process is just to challenge them differently so that your game and you, organically and mentally, grow.”

The Spanish connection! Mikel Arteta explains why he 'identifies' with fellow big-name managers Pep Guardiola & Xabi Alonso

Mikel Arteta has plenty of common ground and long-term relationships with two of the top-rated managers in the world, Pep Guardiola and Xabi Alonso.

Arteta asked about Guardiola & AlonsoDiscusses long-term relationshipsIdentifies with 'everything' about PepFollow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱WHAT HAPPENED?

Arteta was asked by if he identifies with the coaching and tactical styles utilised by fellow Spaniards Pep Guardiola and Xabi Alonso, in charge of Manchester City and Real Madrid respectively. Arteta replied that he did because he knows both men "very well".

AdvertisementGetty Images SportWHAT ARTETA SAID

"I identify with them in many ways," Arteta said. "First, because we've played in the same position, but also because I know them both very well.

"I played with Xabi, and I've known Pep since I was 15 and worked with him for four years. I identify with his style of play, his game plan, his vision, his way of carrying himself…everything.

"I don't like to compare [them with each other]; they are two very similar ideas executed in very different ways. I have my own."

THE BIGGER PICTURE

Arteta first encountered Alonso in the summer of 2004 when he joined home town club Real Sociedad, signed so that the pair could play together. It was only brief, as Alonso was quickly sold to Liverpool, although they did soon share some common ground on opposite sides of the Merseyside divide after Arteta moved to Everton at the start of 2005. His relationship with Guardiola goes back further and deeper. When Arteta joined Barcelona's famed La Masia in 1997, Guardiola was a superstar of the first-team and perhaps the most revered academy graduate at that point in the club's history. He left Camp Nou in 2001 but sought out Arteta 15 years later when first assembling his coaching staff at Manchester City.

Getty ImagesWHAT NEXT?

Into his seventh season as a Premier League manager, Arteta will do battle Guardiola again as soon as September 21, when Manchester City visit in the Emirates Stadium. The reverse fixture in Manchester is scheduled for April 18. Arteta could also face Alonso in the coming months, but only if the Gunners meet Real Madrid in the Champions League, either in the league phase or knockout rounds. The draw for the former will take place on August 28.

Man arrested after Bournemouth star Antoine Semenyo's report of racial abuse during Premier League opener against Liverpool

A man from Liverpool is being questioned in police custody after Bournemouth's Antoine Semenyo reported being targeted with racist abuse at Anfield.

Police arrest suspect after Semenyo abuseIn custody for questioningMaximum punishment is two years in prisonFollow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱WHAT HAPPENED?

Following an investigation launched on Friday night, Merseyside Police confirmed on Saturday afternoon that a 47-year-old local man has been arrested on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence in connection with the incident. The man had been identified and was ejected from the stadium as soon as it happened.

AdvertisementGetty Images SportTHE BIGGER PICTURE

Semenyo reported the abuse to the referee and the game was temporarily paused. The Bournemouth forward later praised the response to the incident, thanking his teammates, the Liverpool players, the rest of the fans in the stadium, and the match officials for how it was handled.

WHAT MERSEYSIDE POLICE SAID

A statement from Liverpool's local police force confirmed: "We have arrested a man following reports racist abuse was directed towards Bournemouth player Antoine Semenyo during his team's Premier League fixture versus Liverpool at Anfield on Friday 15 August. The suspect's identity was confirmed and he was removed from the ground following the report.

"A 47-year-old man from Liverpool has today (Saturday 16 August) been arrested on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence. He has been taken into custody to be interviewed."

AFPWHAT NEXT?

In UK law, racially or religiously aggravated offences carry a higher maximum penalty than the basic equivalent offences and can result in a maximum sentence of up to two years in prison, an unlimited fine, or both. Depending on which specific section of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 this incident falls under will determine the exact punishment if the suspect is found guilty.

He's just like Saka: Arsenal pushing to sign £38m star with "electric pace"

Arsenal are set to announce their first batch of summer recruits soon.

Goalkeeper Kepa Arrizabalaga as well as midfielders Martín Zubimendi and Christian Nørgaard are all reportedly poised to join Arsenal in the next week or so, the former providing a back-up to David Raya, while the latter duo will be replacing the outgoing Thomas Partey and Jorginho at the base of midfield.

Arsenal manager MikelArtetacelebrates after the match

Nevertheless, Mikel Arteta, Andrea Berta and the Arsenal hierarchy still have plenty of work to do.

Arsenal targeting attacking reinforcements

After a third successive second-place finish in the Premier League, it is clear what Arsenal need to add this summer and that is more attacking firepower, as the table below outlines.

League finish

2nd

2nd

2nd

Goals scored

88

91

69

Expected goals

71.6

76.1

59.9

Shots

589

647

544

Shots on target

194

209

178

Shot-creating actions

1,045

1,185

969

As shown in the table, last season, when compared to their two previous title bids under Arteta, the Gunners’ attacking output was significantly down by all available metrics.

That’s why the debate of the summer remains Benjamin Šeško or Viktor Gyökeres, with the club clearly in the market for the new number nine, but they’re also looking for reinforcements out-wide too.

Thus, according to reports in Spain, Arsenal are ‘strongly’ interested in signing Borussia Dortmund’s Karim Adeyemi, with the Gunners said to be ‘pushing’ for his signature.

They add that the German international, who is believed to be available for around €45m (£38m), is viewed as a ‘serious alternative’ to Barcelona-bound Nico Williams, as he would add ‘explosiveness’ to Arsenal’s forward line.

The 23-year-old began his senior career at RB Salzburg, scoring four Champions League goals for die Roten Bullen, thereby earning a £38m move to Borussia Dortmund three summers ago.

Transfer Focus

Mega money deals, controversial moves and big-name flops. This is the home of transfer news and opinion across Football FanCast.

So far, in 105 appearances for die Schwarzgelben, Adeyemi has scored 26 goals and registered 17 assists, featuring in all three of their Club World Cup fixtures this summer, starting against both Fluminense in East Rutherford and Ulsan HD in Ohio.

Now, could he become the 13th German to play for Arsenal, joining current Die Mannschaft teammate Kai Havertz, while following in the footsteps of Mesut Özil, Bernd Leno, Per Mertesacker, Lukas Podolski and others?

How Karim Adeyemi would improve Arsenal

Arsenal are looking to improve their left-wing options, with most agreeing that an upgrade on Gabriel Martinelli​​​​​​​ and Leandro Trossard, or at the very least an alternative to both, is required to take the Gunners to the next level.

Nevertheless, speaking on the Arsecast, Andrew Mangan and James McNicholas both agreed that it is highly “unlikely” that the Gunners will sign two wingers this summer, so someone who can play on the left but also cover for Bukayo Saka on the right would be ideal.

Well, Adeyemi certainly fits that brief, having been deployed on both flanks by both Dortmund managers, Nuri Şahin and Niko Kovač, throughout this season.

So, let’s assess how he compares to the gold standard of Arsenal wide-players, namely the aforementioned Saka – a player he is deemed to be statistically similar to among those in their position across Europe’s top five leagues, as per FBref.

Non-penalty goals

95th

77th

Shots

82nd

87th

Assists

83rd

96th

Expected assists

91st

98th

Shot-creating actions

45th

91st

Progressive carries

71st

83rd

Successful take-ons

87th

75th

Touches

79th

95th

Progressive passes received

71st

94th

FBref disclaimer: these statistics are based upon matches played in domestic leagues and UEFA club competitions across the last 365 days, and are in comparison to other attacking midfielders and wingers.

As the table outlines, Saka does come out on top for the vast majority of metrics, but that is not to be dismissive of Adeyemi, given that the England international is one of the best players in the world, at least according to teammate Martinelli.

The German’s statistics are broadly comparable to those of Saka, scoring more non-penalty goals and successfully completing a higher percentage of his take-ons.

Jacek Kulig of Football Talent Scout describes him as possessing “electric pace” and “superb dribbling skills”, simply labelling him a “world-class talent”.

Meantime, Lee Scott of Total Football Analysis believes that he provides ‘a direct goal threat’ and the ability to ‘carry the ball at speed past defenders’, while Tunde Young of Breaking the Lines boldly asserts ‘he could go on to be a multiple Ballon D’Or winner, just like Lionel Messi’.

Thus, it is clear that Adeyemi ticks a lot of boxes for Arsenal and would be an excellent, exciting addition, should they be able to pull this deal off. He could well prove to be like a left-sided Saka.

£200k-a-week Arsenal star "set to leave" as director travels for UK talks

He’s poised to leave the Gunners imminently.

ByEmilio Galantini Jun 27, 2025

VIDEO: Cristiano Ronaldo can't stop scoring: Al-Nassr star continues red-hot pre-season form with double against Almeria

Cristiano Ronaldo struck twice, including a stunning team goal, to continue his scoring form for Al-Nassr against Spanish outfit Almeria in pre-season.

Two goals for RonaldoFive goals in four daysTeam goal followed by penaltyFollow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱WHAT HAPPENED?

Ronaldo struck twice in the first half at Juegos del Mediterraneo stadium to turn the game on its head and give Al-Nassr the lead. Ronaldo first came after a fantastic team move involving Sadio Mane, before he fired home a penalty to continue his devastating prowess in front of goal for the Saudi side. Al-Nassr's official X page called the Portuguese's first strike "a perfect goal".

AdvertisementWATCH THE CLIPTHE BIGGER PICTURE

Ronaldo continues a red-hot scoring streak with five goals in just a matter of days, after a hat-trick against Portuguese top-flight side Rio Ave on Thursday. The 40-year-old has struck 800 career goals including 99 for Al-Nassr in competitive fixtures and there is little doubt that we will continue to see the former Real Madrid and Manchester United star find the net in the new season. He recently stated that the "hunger never fades".

GettyWHAT NEXT FOR RONALDO AND AL-NASSR?

Al-Nassr face Al Ittihad in the Super Cup on August 19 in their next crunch clash, where Ronaldo may look to score his 100th competitive goal for the club ahead of what will be another important season in a World Cup year. The legendary forward is believed to want to compete for his native Portugal alongside new team-mate Joao Felix in North America in summer 2026, and may even aim to win the Golden Boot at the tournament.

What about the fans? BCCI could have avoided the Dharamsala mess

There was evidence when the India-Australia schedule was announced that there would be doubts over the venue

Karthik Krishnaswamy14-Feb-2023Siddhartha Nanda, a cricket fan who works in a consulting firm in Bengaluru, holidayed in Dharamsala last winter. On the morning of December 22, he visited the Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association (HPCA) Stadium, and took the photograph you see below.

At the time, the HPCA was relaying the stadium’s outfield as part of its plans to revamp the ground’s drainage.On December 8, the BCCI announced that the HPCA Stadium would host the third Test of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, from March 1 to 5. Looking at the state of the outfield on December 22, Nanda wondered if it would be ready in time.And he wasn’t alone.Luke ‘Sparrow’ Gillian made two trips to Dharamsala, in October and January, to scope out the logistics of bringing a large group of travelling fans to watch the Test match in March. Gillian is an Australian cricket superfan who has travelled to more than 200 Test matches since 1995, and organises tours for large groups of fans under the banner of Australian Cricket Tours (ACT).Related

Can Indian fans ever expect a pleasant stadium experience?

Travelling fans left in the lurch with World Cup schedule still under wraps

India's cheat code: Lower-order muscle

Third India vs Australia Test shifted from Dharamsala to Indore

Difficult questions are coming for Australia, but not just yet

“I’ve been to Dharamsala twice now,” Gillian says. “Went in October last year for two weeks, and I came out again three weeks ago when I did another lap of every venue [hosting the Test series].”I thought we would be lucky to play in Dharamsala, because there just wasn’t enough grass, and that had been growing for about two months to that point, and I thought, ‘if that’s all they’ve got after two months, they’re not going to have enough in the next three weeks, no way’.”Nanda and Gillian were right to have their doubts. On Monday, the BCCI announced it was shifting the Test match from Dharamsala to Indore.Like all BCCI press releases, the one that made this announcement, signed by secretary Jay Shah, was a masterclass in brevity and carefully curated detail. It summed up the reason for the venue swap in one line: “Owing to harsh winter conditions in the region, the outfield lacks sufficient grass density and will need some time to develop fully.””Lacks sufficient grass density” was certainly one way of saying that the outfield, as ESPNcricinfo has reported, still had bare patches where grass cover had not yet taken hold, when the BCCI inspected the ground on February 3 and 11.The release did not mention the relaying of the outfield either. The BCCI must have known what stage this process was at when it announced the venues for the series, a full 14 days before Nanda took his photograph.Perhaps the BCCI expected the HPCA to have the ground ready in time for the match. Perhaps the winter in Dharamsala – a town situated in the upper reaches of the Kangra Valley in the Western Himalayas – was harsher than usual.But the BCCI must have known this was a possibility, and that there was some risk to choosing Dharamsala to host the Test match. The board went ahead and made that choice regardless.It may have done this knowing its capacity to shift venues swiftly, if needed. The BCCI has twice moved the IPL overseas when it has coincided with the Indian general elections, and once, midway through the tournament, during the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. During the 2016 men’s T20 World Cup, the BCCI, as hosts of the tournament, helped the ICC shift the India-Pakistan match from Dharamsala to Kolkata at short notice, over security concerns.When that happened, then ICC chief executive David Richardson said this, among other things, while addressing the media: “The decision was not taken lightly. The ICC and the BCCI understand the disappointment that is likely to be felt by many over the decision to move the match.”There was no mention of fans’ concerns in the BCCI’s statement on Monday. This wasn’t unexpected, considering the experience the board puts spectators through at any given day in any of its stadiums, but the absence of any recognition that fans exist, never mind an apology to them, felt particularly galling in this instance.This was a Test match in March for which the board had announced the dates and venue back in December. This was a venue where the board knew – you would hope – that the state of the outfield could be an issue. And the venue was Dharamsala, which is almost unique in Indian cricket for the number of travelling fans it attracts.Luke Gillian is leading an Australian tour group in India•Getty ImagesThe HPCA Stadium is easily India’s most picturesque ground, backdropped by the snow-capped Dhauladhar range. Dharamsala, and nearby McLeodganj, are major tourist centres. Matches at the HPCA Stadium often coincide with visits from hundreds if not thousands of travelling fans, some driving there from Delhi or other nearby North Indian cities, some travelling from more distant parts of India, and others visiting from overseas, all there to experience the joys of cricket and hill-station tourism.The draw of Dharamsala becomes clear when you speak to Gillian. He says 12 Australian fans travelled with ACT to watch the Nagpur Test, and around 60 will be at the second Test in Delhi, while “55 at the moment” are set to travel to Ahmedabad for the fourth Test.A total of 152 fans signed up for Dharamsala.”People would come to Dharamsala for it being Dharamsala, before the cricket,” Gillian says. “Cricket is a byproduct and a time-filling entertainment.”Gillian is on his seventh tour of India, and is used to the changes in tour schedules, but he says he’s never had to deal with one happening so close to the match.

“If there was a 1% probability that you couldn’t host the match there, you could have picked another venue. You could have given the match to Eden Gardens – Eden Gardens has not hosted an Australia match for 20 years, for heaven’s sake”Mahesh Sethuraman, who was due to travel for the third Test

“I’ve been watching cricket in India since 1996,” he says. “I was celebrating that this was the first Indian cricket tour in all these years [where the schedule] has not changed before the first ball. But even worse, it’s changed after the first ball.”For now, he says there have been no cancellations. “They’re all heading down [to Indore]. They’ve realised that they’ve paid to come this far, and I’m doing my best to limit the damage.”The damage has been extensive.”Flights, hotels, match tickets have all gone. I’ve paid deposits to the hotels, because I said [to them], ‘you will need 1000 bottles of beer. We’ll have parties on day zero, day one and day five – there’s 150 of us and we’ll drink you dry’. So I had to pay a deposit, which is fair enough. That is gone, unfortunately. If we get something back from the hotels, it’s only up to my agent in Delhi to argue on our behalf.”Other fans, travelling individually or in smaller groups, have had to pay heavy prices too. What irks a lot of them is the feeling that the situation was avoidable.”They could have at least said it’s tentative when they announced it,” says Bishen Jeswant, a fan from Bengaluru who had made flight and Airbnb bookings along with a group of friends from within and outside India. “They could have said it was subject to the ground being ready. Then we wouldn’t have made our bookings.”Murali Satagopan, a product-marketing manager based in Lisbon, had travelled to Chennai to meet his family, and pushed back his date of departure by a month – from February 10 to March 10 – to attend the Dharamsala Test. It would have been his first match at an Indian stadium since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic.”The financial loss is not the biggest loss for me,” he says. “But this was about the excitement of seeing five days of a Test, and it’s also a key third Test – where we could see India win the Border-Gavaskar Trophy and qualify for the WTC final.Australia featured in the ground’s one previous Test in 2017•Associated Press”There are many emotional things attached to it too. Virat Kohli and I are pretty much the same age, and all these guys, guys like [R] Ashwin and [Ravindra] Jadeja, seeing their careers coming towards the end, we don’t know if this kind of team will come together again. A new crop may come, but I want to tick this off and say I saw an iconic Test in Dharamsala when India sealed the WTC [final spot] and went on to win the Border-Gavaskar Trophy.”Mahesh Sethuraman, a Singapore-based banker and one of the hosts of the podcast, was due to fly out to Dharamsala too. He asks why it was so essential to schedule the match in Dharamsala when India has so many other venues to choose from.”I’m not offended by the fact that they didn’t apologise to the fans,” he says. “I’m offended by the fact that they finalised the schedule two months back, and if you were remotely in doubt [about Dharamsala], even if there was a 1% probability that you couldn’t host the match there, you could have picked another venue. You could have given the match to Eden Gardens – Eden Gardens has not hosted an Australia match for 20 years, for heaven’s sake. You could have given it to Chepauk, or Chinnaswamy. The scale of how much the BCCI takes the fans for granted is mindboggling.”At a time when what it earns from ticket sales is a fraction of a fraction compared to its revenues from selling broadcast rights, the BCCI probably doesn’t have much of an incentive to prioritise spectators at its grounds.1:48

Rohit Sharma: ‘A blessing to have spinners of this quality’

But by not prioritising them, it could be missing a trick. Gillian says the BCCI could be doing a lot more to use cricket as a means to bring more foreign tourists to India.”The fact that the BCCI never confirm a schedule more than four weeks before [a series] makes it impossible to get the inbound tourism that cricket deserves in India,” he says. “Cricket deserves it, and that is cricket across the country. Indore deserves to have 500 Australians or more come to visit. So too does Ranchi or Rajkot or Visakhapatnam, wherever they do it, but without the time [for fans] to prepare to visit, it’s a lot of foreign investment that’s not coming.”The BCCI are so invested in money and earning money, yet they ignore this element.”It would take a seismic shift for the BCCI to embrace this sort of thinking. It gets by perfectly well, financially, without having to. And its relationship with the paying spectator remains what it is. The situation is perhaps best summed up by Sameer Mohan, a product manager from Bengaluru who is one of a group of fans who host the podcast, whose planned and fully-booked Dharamsala plans came to nothing.”The best way to enjoy cricket in India as a cricket fan is on your own couch,” he says. “Take a holiday, order takeout, get your poison of choice, huddle with your loved ones, and then just watch.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus